The full bank found that the « demand » contemplated in point 181 (1) is a single act or event that occurs at the end of the access period and immediately before (or perhaps only) before the voting process begins. Section 181, paragraph 1, refers to the « request » for workers employed on that date who are covered by the agreement. Full Bench preferred the approach that the « moment » of the application in point S.181 (1) covers the entire access period and is equivalent to the « time » for subheading S.180(2) (a). In early 2010, the CWU revoked all of its BT employees for strike action in 2010 due to a wage demand. The election result was never announced due to legal challenges, but after extensive negotiations, the EEC reached an agreement on payment with BT. A national vote of members approved the wage agreement by an overwhelming majority. Full Bench invited submissions to determine whether clauses 17.3 (a) of the Registered and Licensed Clubs Award 2010 and Clause 27.2 of the Hospitality Award (which deals with executives) should be considered as a regularized wage agreement and, if so, what type clause to replace them. Since the election of the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government, the Union has been trying to redefine its relationship with the Labour Party. In July 2010, the union`s national executive committee agreed to appoint and support Ed Ball`s Labour MP for the 2010 election. In return, Ed Balls MP supported the Keep The Post Public campaign in the summer of 2010 against the coalition government`s intention to privatize Royal Mail. In the original decision, the Commission determined that persons who could be applied in accordance with Part 181 (1) include workers who were employed at the beginning of the voting process until their end, as well as casual workers who worked during that period but did not work during or at the end of the access period. Full Bench respectfully found that the approach had not been achieved by the correct construction of s.181 (1).